Showing posts with label cosmology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cosmology. Show all posts

Monday, 6 January 2014

Ananda Marg, and Cosmology

Cosmology







The cosmology of Ananda Marga philosophy centers around the Cosmic Cycle – the Cycle of Creation, or Brahmacakra. It is a cycle because the finishing point is the same as the starting point, as will become apparent. Note that the cycle is a continual and concurrent process of transformation, with different parts of it at different stages at any one time.
The Cosmic Entity is Brahma. It is everything. Everything exists within It, and nothing exists outside It. It is the one infinite, eternal and intransmutable bliss.
Brahma is composed of two parts: the Cognitive Principle (Consciousness), and the Operative Principle (Force). They are inseparable, just as fire cannot be separated from its burning characteristic.
For philosophical purposes, Consciousness is arbitrarily assigned the male gender, and is known as Purusa, or Shiva. He is the nucleus and witnessing entity of the universe. His Force is assigned the female gender, and is known as Prakrti, or Shakti. She is the force which – under Purusa's direction – transforms a part of Him into the universe. She is a blind force and is always under His control. He does not act but allows Her to act. He is the witness and the witnessed, and She is the action.
Prakrti has three attributes, or binding principles (gunas): the sentient force (sattvaguna), mutative force (rajoguna), and static force (tamoguna).
In the first phase of the cycle, first a small portion of Purusa is metamorphosed into the cosmic sense of existence (Mahattattva – feeling of "I am") by the sentient force. Then a small portion of that "I am" feeling is transformed into the Ahamtattva (feeling of "I do") by the mutative force. Then part of the Ahamtattva is transformed into the Cittatattva ("I have done" feeing) by the static force. The Cittatattva contains all the previous states before it, and all three (Cosmic Mahat, Aham and Citta) constitute the Cosmic Mind, existing within the original Consciousness, Purusa.
Continued bondage by the static force on the Cosmic Citta causes further metamorphosis of Purusa into the fundamental factors of the universe.
The universe is composed of five fundamental factors: ethereal factor (space), aerial (gas), luminous (heat/light), liquid and solid. Each factor is formed from the subtler factor preceding it – from the transformation of part of that factor from which it comes – and as a consequence contains the essence of that preceding factor. Hence the aerial factor comes from (and contains) the ethereal factor, the luminous comes from the aerial and so on. All factors exist within the Cosmic Mind from which they came, and the Cosmic Mind in turn is inherent within them all. The universe is thus a thought-projection of the Cosmic Mind. And as the Cosmic Mind also exists within Purusa, everything is a part of Him and He is within everything.
The dominance of Prakrti over Purusa increases, with each successive stage being cruder and denser than the one before it, the solid factor being the crudest stage of manifestation. Energy (prana) is formed in each factor from the pressure of the static force on that factor. Vital energy (pranah) is formed from the combination of all the different pranas of each fundamental factor within a solid body (the solid factor contains all previous factors within it).
Due to the continued pressure of the static force on the solid factor, eventually the pressure becomes excessive and one of two things occurs:
Explosion (jadasphota):
If the factors are not in the right balance, eventually the solid factor (as a celestial body) will explode, and its constituent factors will merge back into their respective factors of the universe.
Life:
If the environment is congenial, and the factors are in the right balance, some portion of the solid factor gets pulverized subtler than ether, and the Citta within it manifests as mind-stuff, which gives the feeling of "Done-I" to a new unit mind. That mind gets attached to an appropriate body and controls the vital energy of that body, which in turn controls the body's functions.
Because the individual mind comes out of the solid factor from a small part of the Cosmic Mind latent within that factor, it is said that "the microcosm is a miniature of the Macrocosm." It can therefore be seen that mind comes from matter, and matter – via the Cosmic Mind – in turn comes from Consciousness.
Now the Witnessing Consciousness (Purusa) begins to withdraw the power from His Operative Principle. He has allowed Her to bind Him to the ultimate state of crudity (this process is called Saincara), and He now gradually contracts Her power until the unit mind merges back into Him. This returning phase is known as Pratisaincara.
In the course of Pratisaincara the unit mind gradually evolves over many different births, in many different bodies. It adopts more complex physical structures as it evolves, appropriate to its desire of expression. Note that there is a clear distinction here between body and mind. The body is the vehicle that the mind adopts according to its degree of evolution – life being the existence of mind in association with a particular body, and death being the temporary loss of the physical structure until a new one is attained by the mind.
The mind develops as the bondage of the binding principles decreases. At first the static force within the mind dominates, and citta (instinct) is the predominant tendency. In the course of development, the mutative force eventually becomes dominant, and the unit aham ("doer I") evolves out of the citta. The dominance of aham over citta manifests as the intellect, or ego. Finally, the sentient force dominates the mutative, and unit mahat (existential "I-feeling") evolves out of the aham. The dominance of mahat over aham manifests as intuition.
So we may find creatures and plants with only instinct, or with intellect as well, or with all three (instinct, intellect and intuition). In undeveloped beings it is instinct which dominates. In developing beings there is an increase of intellect over instinct. But it is only at the human stage that intellect is predominant.
At this stage the mind starts to question the nature of its own existence and the spiritual quest begins. The desire for spiritual practice increases as the ego is gradually eclipsed by intuition and the attraction for the Supreme Nucleus. This attraction is called devotion, or bhakti. Devotion is love for the Infinite. It is said that when devotion is attained, everything is attained, because it leads to final merger with the Supreme.

"Knowing oneself is the real knowledge;
serving all with the ideation of God the real action;
and the vow to please God the real devotion."
Shrii Shrii Anandamurti

Attraction towards the Cosmic Nucleus accelerates as the mind expands and becomes more subtle. One begins to experience the merger of mind in the Goal. This is called samadhi, which literally means "sameness (absorption, or oneness) with the Goal." Although there are different types of samadhi, they can all be classified into two general categories: savikalpa and nirvikalpa.
Savikalpa means "with vikalpa," or "with mental thought or feeling." So Savikalpa Samadhi is the state of absorption in the Cosmic Mind. Because the essence of mind (even the Cosmic Mind) is the "I am" feeling (the existential "I-feeling"), there remains in this samadhi the feeling of existence, or "I am."
Nirvikalpa Samadhi is the state of non-qualified absorption, where the tendencies of mind are completely suspended. Nirvikalpa means "without vikalpa," or "without mental thought or feeling." It is the state of absolute bliss – complete absorption in Cosmic Consciousness. It is not possible to come even close to thinking about this state, let alone describing it, because it is beyond the mind. One's mind exists in and of Consciousness. We cannot think about it simply because it is not possible to think of anything beyond the boundary of one's own mind. The only way of recognizing that one has been in that supreme state is the experience of waves of bliss in the mind that follow it.

"I do not say that I know Him; nor do I say that I do not know Him.
Because I know that He is beyond all knowing and not knowing."
Shrii Shrii Anandamurti

Savikalpa Samadhi of permanent nature is called liberation, or mukti. It is the dissolution of mind into the Cosmic Mind. Nirvikalpa Samadhi of permanent nature is called salvation, or moksa. It is the permanent absorption of mind in Cosmic Consciousness.
Spiritual practice, therefore, is the process of transcending the mind into the Consciousness within which it exists: the Cosmic Consciousness. It is this transcendence of the "I-feeling" that results in the supreme experience of the Absolute: "Where 'I' is, 'He' is not; where 'He' is, 'I' is not."


"Cosmic Consciousness abides in the very sense of existence,
in one's very heart's desire."
Shrii Shrii Anandamurti

Where Consciousness exists both as the nucleus Witnessing Entity and the metamorphosed Cosmic Mind (and universe), that state of Brahma is known as Saguna Brahma. Where Consciousness exists only in its un-metamorphosed state (Prakrti here is dormant), that state is known as Nirguna Brahma.
Taraka Brahma is the common point between the two. In this state Brahma adopts a physical body of the five fundamental factors (Mahasambhuti) and manifests as Sadguru (the highest guru). It is said that when the desire for liberation arises in the mind, one attains one's Sadguru. He is the guru in the real sense of the term because He is the bridge between Nirguna and Saguna Brahma, and is able to teach the proper method of transcendence from the manifested worldly state to the unmanifested state of Supreme Bliss. This is essentially a devotional process.


Email info at anandamarga.org if you have any questions

Monday, 9 September 2013

Cosmology / A Hierarchy of Realities


 
 
 
The Dirah Betachtonim system, outlined in brief in the previous section, amounts to a total revolution in religious thinking. It does not merely shed light on some difficult theological problem, nor only add extra emphasis to some particular religious issue—it leaves virtually nothing intact. Indeed, though firmly rooted in classic Chasidic teachings, though drawing its sustenance from probing the depths of Torah texts, Dirah Betachtonim does not proceed from within conventional methods of religious thinking and then depart at some significant point; but rather proceeds along its own premises and terms. It amounts to a more profound, more encompassing Torah perspective from which all details assume new light. In this section of the book we will attempt to bring to the fore the implications of this revolution, describing how many metaphysical subjects—such as cosmology, cosmic unity, the drama of Creation, the mystical experience, even theological language and basic Logic—assume totally new dimensions in this theological system.
We start with cosmology. First, we present a brief summary of the cosmology that emerges from Jewish writings in general, drawing in particular upon the mystical literature, namely Kabbalistic and Chasidic texts, and subsequently go on to note a striking change of perspective in the Dirah Betachtonim system.


Cosmology in Earlier Jewish thought
Our senses make us aware of the world of sight, sound, smell, taste and touch. Our minds introduce us to ideas and emotions. But according to Judaism, neither the world of sensual phenomena, nor the worlds of ideas and emotions represent all there is to reality. It is becoming increasingly evident to the modern mind that the human senses are not the final arbiter of what constitutes reality. Two hundred years ago it was universally held that in a silent room no music exists. Yet given today’s technology, this paradox indeed occurs, in the everyday reality of radio waves inaudible to human ears. Moreover, contemporary science has become increasingly aware that man not only does not know the outer parameters of reality but can never know them. Thus, a popular theme of science fiction is realities other than our own which operate on totally different ground rules, within totally different “operating systems.”
Jewish thinking has long proceeded along similar lines: it recognizes the existence of realities other than our own; but not physical realities—spiritual realities.
In the Bible itself we hear echoes from spheres beyond normal human access. We read of prophecy, of angels, of Heaven. In addition to all we read in Scripture, in the Sages’ writings we learn in considerable detail about life after this mortal life, we hear briefs of discussions from the Heavenly Court, we learn of mystical journeys into higher worlds. Our thinkers through the ages, notably Maimonides, have repeatedly emphasized that all these otherly entities and realms mentioned by Scripture and the Sages are not physical but spiritual. Speech, wings, eyes, as well as all other apparently human characteristics used in relation to heavenly beings, are all allegorical, metaphors. Angels, then, as well as all other similar phenomena, are beings that exist on a plane that spiritually transcends the plane of our existence.
Here an important note is in order. Stating that something is spiritual rather than physical need not detract from its reality. The fact that something is inaccessible to the human senses gives no reason to conclude it is not real (in the common sense of the term). Upon further consideration, we may realize that the opposite is in fact true. Take once again the example of radio waves—in contradistinction to audible sound. The words you utter in your room hardly travel beyond the room, and even traveling that distance takes a relatively long time. On the other hand, one can communicate with people on the moon via radio in a time period as brief as a second or so. In other words, the reality of audible sound, though readily available to the human senses, is restricted to a specific time and place, whereas the reality of inaudible radio waves persists (relatively) through the expansive reaches of time and space.
Or, take a simple abstract concept, 2 + 2 = 4, in contradistinction to a table which can be actually touched. The table can be broken and burned, it does not exist next door, it may not have existed one hundred years ago and in a hundred years time it may well no longer exist. But 2 + 2 = 4 existed one thousand years ago, as it will exist in a thousand years time, as it does on the moon. And it cannot be burned. In other words, the reality of the table is contingent, existing solely at the confluence of favorable conditions of temperature, space, time, etc.—vary the temperature, space or time, and the table is no longer. Whereas the reality of concepts, though imperceptible to human vision and touch, is (in a sense) absolute—existing independently of temperature, space and time, and the changes that occur in them.
What is true of radio waves and concepts is true of the spiritual worlds of which Jewish literature speaks (with relevant differences, of course). Their not being material does not detract from their reality; to the contrary, it makes for a more encompassing and persistent reality.


Spiritual and Physical Worlds
In the mystical literature, that is, in Kabbalistic and Chasidic texts, we are introduced to the topography, as it were, of the spiritual realities. We learn that, in general, all of reality is divided into four worlds. Each world, in turn, is made up of ten spheres. In greater detail, we are told, there are infinite numbers of worlds emanating from G-d.
Since these worlds are spiritual, transcending time and space, spatial boundaries are meaningless. What, then, sets one world apart from another? Much as 2 + 2 = 4 is distinct from 3 x 3 = 9 in terms of their conceptual parameters, though spatial and temporal differences are immaterial, spiritual realities are similarly set apart by their respective spiritual parameters. Each world represents the embodiment of a particular spiritual characteristic. For example, one world is described as a “nest” for G-d’s wisdom, another for His emotions. The worlds are also set apart in terms of their relative proximity or distance, as it were, from G-d: each emanating world is progressively lower, less abstract and spiritual, embodying a lesser and lower manifestation of G-d; each is less G-d-aware than the former.
Where does our own reality fit into all of this? At the very bottom of the chain of worlds, where G-dliness is totally obscured—our finite, physical reality eventually emerges. Here, no Divine wisdom or love permeate the atmosphere, the glory of G-d has now totally disappeared; indeed, G-d may appear altogether irrelevant in a world which seems to proceed independently, by its own G-dforsaken rules.
The Emphasis of Jewish Mystical Cosmology
Let us stop for a moment to take in the emphasis of this multi-world cosmology. To what is attention drawn in these classic mystical descriptions of various realities? Doubtless, to the higher worlds, the worlds where the glory of G-d is truly manifest. The didactic purpose of the discussions in the mystical texts is, in fact, to impress upon the human that no matter how natural his world seems, no matter how hard, fast and immutable it may appear to him, there exist higher, nobler, spiritual, worlds; that in fact, in the broader scheme of things, the human’s world with its pervasive physicality is quite an aberration. And hence, the human ought to strive to identify with those higher realities, to live a life that has meaning vis-à-vis the more spiritual, truer, worlds; even to try to transcend his own reality and tune in, as it were, to those lofty stations.
Time and again, throughout the literature, whether in the words of the Talmudic sages or of later mystics, the higher realities are lauded and our reality is played down. Time and again our world is contrasted with higher worlds to underscore the great value of those realms and the little import of our own.
As we have noted, what sets various worlds apart from each other is their relative awareness of G-d—and our reality is that to which virtually no G-dliness filters through. According to the mystical literature, a series of contractions and hidings of G-d’s light occurs, as it were, as the Divine creative energy chains downwards, culminating in a major parsa, or “curtain,” separating this reality from all that is higher than it. This world is physical. It is finite. It is mundane. This is a world, we read, which is almost entirely bad, in which evil prospers and suffering abounds1; a world in which G-d can be totally overlooked. The Divine presence cries, as it were, over its imprisonment in this reality—in “this lowly world, beneath which there is no lower2.”


Dirah Betachtonim Cosmology
Enters Dirah Betachtonim and all this is, as it were, turned upside down. This lowly world, maintains Dirah Betachtonim, indeed specifically “this lowly world, beneath which there is no lower,” is the most remarkable of all the worlds. It is specifically here that G-d desired a dirah, a dwelling place. No need to transcend this world! It is here, here as nowhere else, that the human can fulfill his true spiritual potential, it is specifically here that the deepest recesses of the Divine can be reached.
True, argues Dirah Betachtonim, this world is not evidently G-dly, but the G-dliness available here is of greater quality than in all the spiritual worlds: for G-d is not merely evident here, here He is.
True, in the higher worlds, G-dliness is manifest. But what is the nature of the G-dliness at those lofty stations? Wisdom and Knowledge; Awe and Splendor. One world is a “nest” for G-d’s wisdom, another for His emotions; angels quiver in the love and awe of G-d. But as we have seen earlier, all of these are not the Essence of G-d; they are His manifestations, merely G-dly qualities. It is specifically in our world which makes no G-dly “statement,” where the essence prevails.
In fact, in higher realities where Divine majesty and awe are evident, where Divine qualities and characteristics—such as Wisdom, Love or Omnipotence—are manifest, the very Being of G-d is overlooked. As it were, the “adjectives” hide the “noun” they describe. Where Divine meaning and significance are prominent, the fact that things exist goes unnoticed; where superimpositions, characteristics of the essence, are at the forefront, the essence itself is not seen. Thus, the most fundamental dimension of reality as well as the most fundamental dimension of G-d—Essence—is ignored in the higher realms. Whereas in our physical reality which is devoid of all manifestations of G-d, in our mundane world which represents nothing of metaphysical significance, in this lowly world which is bare of all Divine expressions and characteristics—the sole relationship with G-d is that of the naked essence of reality with the unembellished, untainted Essence of G-d.
Here, then, maintains Dirah Betachtonim, yes, our “lowly world, beneath which there is no lower,” is in fact the most remarkable of all worlds—the arena in which the most profound dimension of reality relates to the deepest recesses of the Divine.
Dirah Betachtonim, then, does not ignore normative mystical cosmology. The Dirah Betachtonim literature perpetually makes explicit reference to concepts such as those outlined earlier in this chapter concerning the greatness of other realities and the lowliness of our own, and its perspectives develop conceptually within the same metaphysical mappings of reality. But it asks us to go a step further, to look not merely at appearances, expressions, characteristics or values, but to probe the essence, the very being of reality. And in that realm, where being is of significance, rather than being something, it is this reality that assumes the greatest metaphysical value.
This system continues to highlight that in terms of spiritual significance this world is the lowest, that in terms of religious meaning this world is even obnoxious. There is however, maintains Dirah Betachtonim, a plane where significance and meaning are transcended—where this world alone manifests naked being, merged with the pure Being of G-d. In higher realities it is G-d’s glory, here it is His Essence; in higher worlds G-d is manifest, here He is.
 
 
 
 
 

Thursday, 22 November 2012

The Cosmology of Lurianic Kabbalah





the emanation of worlds

    the concentric emanation of worlds, according to Lurianic Kabbalah
    {from R. I. Krakovsky - Kabbalah, the Light of Redemption)

 
Lurianic Kabbalah

The Five Worlds

Whereas in the Zohar and elsewhere there are only four worlds or universes (planes of existence) the Lurianic system adds a fifth universe, Adam Kadmon, a s ort of manifest Godhead, that mediates between the En Sof and the four lower worlds.

In Lurianic cosmology therefore we have the following strata of reality:

  • En Sof - Absolute or Infinite - Beyond all archetpes
  • Adam Kadmon - Tetragrammatons or Divine names
  • Atzilut - Sefirot or Divine Archetypes and Partzufim or Divine Personas
  • Beriah - Archangels and Divine Souls (neshamot)
  • Yetzirah - Angels
  • Asiyah - Inferior Angels and klippot; Physical world

It is interesting to consider that whereas for other Kabbalists it was the En Sof which was identical to the Deity, for Luria it was the world of Atzilut, or at least its higher aspects. These aspects of divinity Luria refers to as Partzufim, more on which shortly. Thus he distinguishes between Atzilut and the three lower worlds [Sholem, pp. 272­3].

"Scientific Mysticism" of Michael Whiteman

  The previous post gave reference to the book below by an academic. It is similiar but not identical to the ideas of my paradigm known as ...