The name "Einstein" evokes images of genius, but was Albert Einstein, in fact, a plagiarist, who copied the theories of Lorentz, Poincare, Gerber, and Hilbert? A scholarly documentation of Albert Einstein's plagiarism of the theory of relativity, "Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist" discloses Einstein's method for manipulating credit for the work of his contemporaries, reprints the prior works he parroted, and demonstrates through formal logical argument that Albert Einstein could not have drawn the conclusions he drew without prior knowledge of the works he copied, but failed to reference. Numerous republished quotations from Einstein's contemporaries prove that they were aware of his plagiarism.
"The appearance of Dr. Silberstein's recent article on 'General Relativity without the Equivalence Hypothesis' encourages me to restate my own views on the subject. I am perhaps entitled to do this as my work on the subject of General Relativity was published before that of Einstein and Kottler, and appears to have been overlooked by recent writers." -- Harry Bateman "All this was maintained by Poincare and others long before the time of Einstein, and one does injustice to truth in ascribing the discovery to him." -- Charles Nordmann "[Einstein's] paper 'Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Koerper' in Annalen der Physik. . . contains not a single reference to previous literature. It gives you the impression of quite a new venture. But that is, of course, as I have tried to explain, not true." -- Max Born "In point of fact, therefore, Poincare was not only the first to enunciate the principle, but he also discovered in Lorentz's work the necessary mathematical formulation of the principle. All this happened before Einstein's paper appeared." -- G. H. Keswani "Einstein's explanation is a dimensional disguise for Lorentz's. . . . Thus Einstein's theory is not a denial of, nor an alternative for, that of Lorentz. It is only a duplicate and disguise for it. . . . Einstein continually maintains that the theory of Lorentz is right, only he disagrees with his 'interpretation.' Is it not clear, therefore, that in this, as in other cases, Einstein's theory is merely a disguise for Lorentz's, the apparent disagreement about 'interpretation' being a matter of words only?" -- James Mackaye "The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources." -- Albert Einstein
The Bloggers Comment
I have known about the claims of plagiarism against Einstein for a long time now, and it appears correct unfortunately. I cannot find any real attempts by anyone to seriously debunk the claims of Christopher Jon Bjerknes who wrote the book on the subject.
As for myself, I have been developing the major paradigm of Transfinancial Economics (TFE), and I admit wholeheartedly that it is very similar to Modern Monetary Reform, and Social Credit. TFE though is different to the latter two subjects in that it notably puts emphasis on the huge importance of Information Technology in Economics, Finance, and Banking being used in "unusual," and revolutionary ways. However, such "cybernetic economics" is not totally unknown as there were failed attempts to achieve it.
As for the development of Multi-Dimensional Science it has what appears to be a unique "scientific" Methodology. But the "components" which make it up are not new.
Also, as for the Universal Debating Project, this is very much like debatepedia, but is arguably far more ambitious in scope, and understanding.
As for the claims against Einstein there are a large number of internet links, two of which appear here..